2022 N3 (3)
LIBERALISATION OF SENTENCES AND HUMANISATION OF CUSTODIAL SENTENCES IN GEORGIA
PDF
95-103
ABSTRACT

In the current process of EU integration, it has been not only desirable and appropriate but also necessary to regard the conceptual basics of the principles of democracy and to approximate them with international standards. This, in turn, entails the liberalisation of criminal legislation. Since 2004, the influence of authoritarianism and radicalism on the criminal legislation of Georgia had been evident, but it has changed since 2013 when the process of liberalisation of criminal policy was initiated. Although it has been nine years since the initiation of the process, there is still a lot more to be done for the improvement of criminal legislation, all the more so because the weakening of the liberalisation policy can be observed since 2015 due to the increase of certain serious criminality.

Keywords: Liberalisation, Resocialisation, Legimetry
REFERENCES
  1. Normative Documents of GeorgiaCriminal Code of Georgia, 1999.
  2. Criminal Procedure Code of Georgia, 2009.
  3. Imprisonment Code of Georgia, 2010.
  4. Order No 151 of the Minister of Corrections and Legal Assistance of Georgia, 28 October 2010.
  5. Order No 320 of the Minister of Justice of Georgia, 7 August 2018.
  6. Law of Georgia on the Procedure for Enforcing Non-custodial Sentences and Probation, 2001.
    Native Literature
  7. Beccaria C., On Crimes and Punishments, Translated from Italian by Khutsurauli I., 2003, Tbilisi.
  8. Gamkrelidze O., Problems of Criminal Law, Tinatin Tsereteli Institute of State and Law, VolumeIII, Publication Meridiani, Tbilisi, 2013.
  9. Guruli P., Parole– Legimetrical Comprehension, Journal Law and World, 2017, No 6.
  10. Dolidze T., Circumstances Excluding and Mitigating Guilt in Criminal Law, Institute of Law ofthe European University, 2022.
  11. Lekveishvili M., Goals of punishment and criminal and criminological aspects of sentencing,Justice and Law, 2014, No 4.
  12. Ugrekhelidze M., Phenomenology of Post-Criminal Emotional Feelings, International Journal ofLaw – Law and World, 2017, No 7.
  13. Ugrekhelidze M., The Importance of the Degree of Culpability for the Individualization ofPunishment, Soviet Law, 1978, No 6.
  14. Ugrekhelidze M., Law as the Dimension System, Scientific Journal – Georgian Politics, 2015,No 21.
  15. Ghlonti G., Kelenjeridze I., Dolidze T., Ghlonti A., Comparative Criminal Law, Institute of Lawof the European University, 2022.
  16. Tsereteli T., Legal Terminology, Tbilisi, 1963.
  17. Tsirkvadze T., Offences Committed under the Provoked Temporary Insanity as a VictimologicalMatter, Scientific Journal Criminologist, 2020, No 15.
  18. Liberalization Trends of Criminal Law Legislation in Georgia, Tbilisi, Meridiani, 2016.
  19. Suggestions and Recommendations on Problematic Issues of Criminal Law Practice, the SupremeCourt of Georgia, 2007, Tbilisi.
    Foreign Literature
  20. Andrew Ashworth, Sentencing and Criminal Justice, Fifth edition, Cambridge University Press,New York, 2010.
  21. Lex Talionis, The Torah – A Modern Commentary, New York: Union American HebrewCongretions, plaut, 1981.
  22. Hans Kelsen, Vergeltung und Kausalität, Hague, 1941.
  23. Tsereteli T.V. Causality in Criminal Law, M., 1961.
  24. Ugrekhelidze M. Criminal Law – Experience in Theoretical Modelling, M., 1987.
  25. Ugrekhelidze M., From Legimetry to Legal Dimensiology. Journal “Caucasus InternationalUniversity Herald”, Tbilisi, 2011, No 3.
  26. Ugrekhelidze M., Die Bedeutung des Schuldgehalts der Tat im Strafrecht. Zwietes DeutschSovietishces Kolloquium über Recht und Kriminologie (B2), „Nomos“ Publishing house, Badenbaden, Germany, 1984.